0.00/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.10 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cLJUNGSffc true 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:32:21 EDT 2022 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.11/0.31 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.11/0.31 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.11/0.31 % Number of cores: 8 0.11/0.31 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.16/0.31 % Running in HO mode 0.17/0.57 % Total configuration time : 828 0.17/0.57 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.17/0.57 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 1.19/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 1.19/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 1.19/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 1.19/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 1.19/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 1.19/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 1.19/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 1.19/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 1.19/0.71 % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh. 1.19/0.71 % done 13 iterations in 0.023s 1.19/0.71 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 1.19/0.71 % SZS output start Refutation 1.19/0.71 thf(q_type, type, q: $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(rel_k_type, type, rel_k: $i > $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(mand_type, type, mand: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(sk__2_type, type, sk__2: $i). 1.19/0.71 thf(sk__3_type, type, sk__3: $i). 1.19/0.71 thf(mnot_type, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(mimplies_type, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(p_type, type, p: $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(mdia_k_type, type, mdia_k: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(sk__4_type, type, sk__4: $i). 1.19/0.71 thf(mbox_k_type, type, mbox_k: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(r_type, type, r: $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(mor_type, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(mvalid_type, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 1.19/0.71 thf(mdia_k, axiom,(( mdia_k ) = 1.19/0.71 (^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( mnot @ ( mbox_k @ ( mnot @ Phi ) ) )))). 1.19/0.71 thf(mbox_k, axiom,(( mbox_k ) = 1.19/0.71 (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( rel_k @ W @ V ) ) ) )))). 1.19/0.71 thf('0', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mbox_k ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( rel_k @ W @ V ) ) ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mbox_k])). 1.19/0.71 thf('1', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mbox_k ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ![X4:$i]: ( ( V_1 @ X4 ) | ( ~( rel_k @ V_2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 define([status(thm)])). 1.19/0.71 thf(mnot, axiom,(( mnot ) = (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ~( Phi @ W ) )))). 1.19/0.71 thf('2', plain, (( mnot ) = ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ~( Phi @ W ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mnot])). 1.19/0.71 thf('3', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mnot ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:$i]: ( ~( V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 define([status(thm)])). 1.19/0.71 thf('4', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mdia_k ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( mnot @ ( mbox_k @ ( mnot @ Phi ) ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mdia_k, '1', '3'])). 1.19/0.71 thf('5', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mdia_k ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( mnot @ ( mbox_k @ ( mnot @ V_1 ) ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 define([status(thm)])). 1.19/0.71 thf(mvalid, axiom,(( mvalid ) = 1.19/0.71 (^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) )))). 1.19/0.71 thf('6', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mvalid])). 1.19/0.71 thf('7', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( ![X4:$i]: ( V_1 @ X4 ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 define([status(thm)])). 1.19/0.71 thf(mimplies, axiom,(( mimplies ) = 1.19/0.71 (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ Phi ) @ Psi )))). 1.19/0.71 thf(mor, axiom,(( mor ) = 1.19/0.71 (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ( Phi @ W ) | ( Psi @ W ) )))). 1.19/0.71 thf('8', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mor ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ( Phi @ W ) | ( Psi @ W ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mor])). 1.19/0.71 thf('9', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mor ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ( V_1 @ V_3 ) | ( V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 define([status(thm)])). 1.19/0.71 thf('10', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mimplies ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ Phi ) @ Psi ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mimplies, '9', '3'])). 1.19/0.71 thf('11', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mimplies ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ V_1 ) @ V_2 ) )), 1.19/0.71 define([status(thm)])). 1.19/0.71 thf(mand, axiom,(( mand ) = 1.19/0.71 (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o )]: 1.19/0.71 ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ Phi ) @ ( mnot @ Psi ) ) )))). 1.19/0.71 thf('12', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mand ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o )]: 1.19/0.71 ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ Phi ) @ ( mnot @ Psi ) ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mand, '9', '3'])). 1.19/0.71 thf('13', plain, 1.19/0.71 (( mand ) = 1.19/0.71 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: 1.19/0.71 ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ V_1 ) @ ( mnot @ V_2 ) ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 define([status(thm)])). 1.19/0.71 thf(prove, conjecture, 1.19/0.71 (mvalid @ 1.19/0.71 ( mimplies @ 1.19/0.71 ( mor @ ( mdia_k @ ( mand @ p @ q ) ) @ ( mdia_k @ ( mand @ p @ r ) ) ) @ 1.19/0.71 ( mdia_k @ p ) ))). 1.19/0.71 thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture, 1.19/0.71 (![X4:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ( ~( ( ~( ![X6:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ( ~( q @ X6 ) ) | ( ~( p @ X6 ) ) | ( ~( rel_k @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ) | 1.19/0.71 ( ~( ![X8:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ( ~( r @ X8 ) ) | ( ~( p @ X8 ) ) | ( ~( rel_k @ X4 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | 1.19/0.71 ( ~( ![X10:$i]: ( ( ~( p @ X10 ) ) | ( ~( rel_k @ X4 @ X10 ) ) ) ) ) ))). 1.19/0.71 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, 1.19/0.71 (~( ![X4:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ( ~( ( ~( ![X6:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ( ~( q @ X6 ) ) | ( ~( p @ X6 ) ) | 1.19/0.71 ( ~( rel_k @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ) ) ) | 1.19/0.71 ( ~( ![X8:$i]: 1.19/0.71 ( ( ~( r @ X8 ) ) | ( ~( p @ X8 ) ) | 1.19/0.71 ( ~( rel_k @ X4 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | 1.19/0.71 ( ~( ![X10:$i]: ( ( ~( p @ X10 ) ) | ( ~( rel_k @ X4 @ X10 ) ) ) ) ) ) )), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, 1.19/0.71 (( (rel_k @ sk__2 @ sk__3) | (rel_k @ sk__2 @ sk__4))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 1.19/0.71 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p @ X0) | ~ (rel_k @ sk__2 @ X0))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (( (rel_k @ sk__2 @ sk__3) | ~ (p @ sk__4))), 1.19/0.71 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl0])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, (( (rel_k @ sk__2 @ sk__3) | (p @ sk__4))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 1.19/0.71 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p @ X0) | ~ (rel_k @ sk__2 @ X0))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (( (p @ sk__4) | ~ (p @ sk__3))), 1.19/0.71 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (( (p @ sk__3) | (rel_k @ sk__2 @ sk__4))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 1.19/0.71 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p @ X0) | ~ (rel_k @ sk__2 @ X0))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, (( (p @ sk__3) | ~ (p @ sk__4))), 1.19/0.71 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, (( (p @ sk__3) | (p @ sk__4))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, ( (p @ sk__3)), 1.19/0.71 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl5])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, ( (p @ sk__4)), 1.19/0.71 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl12])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, ( (rel_k @ sk__2 @ sk__3)), 1.19/0.71 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl15])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 1.19/0.71 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (p @ X0) | ~ (rel_k @ sk__2 @ X0))), 1.19/0.71 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain, (~ (p @ sk__3)), 1.19/0.71 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl0])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, ( (p @ sk__3)), 1.19/0.71 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl5])). 1.19/0.71 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, ($false), 1.19/0.71 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl21, zip_derived_cl12])). 1.19/0.71 1.19/0.71 % SZS output end Refutation 1.19/0.71 1.19/0.71 1.19/0.71 % Terminating... 1.94/0.78 % Runner terminated. 1.94/0.79 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 1.94/0.80 EOF